Course materials that satisfy MCLE requirements are substantive in nature and have some level of analysis. If a person were to reference these materials a year from now would that person derive the basic knowledge provided in the presentation from these materials?
Presentation slides that are only bullet points and pictures typically do not qualify.
Examples of things that do qualify on their own include:
- original papers written by a panelist
- powerpoint/prezi/google slides that have substance and depth previously printed papers with copyright permission along with an outline or slides referencing the current program presentation
- hypotheticals paired with rules and answers outlines referencing the current program presentation paired with scholarly journal articles detailed outlines typically longer than 10 pages
- case law articles or draft legislation as reference with an outline or analysis
- a combination of these bullets together
For an at-a-glance guide to course material development, click here.